Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jeff Garzik

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. --Kinu ^t/_c 07:06, 16 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Jeff Garzik[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Little to no notability. Another John S (talk) 18:37, 31 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:05, 2 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:05, 2 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 19:33, 7 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I can't find anything of particular note to clear WP:GNG even, it's just not there. §FreeRangeFrog 03:26, 8 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Cheers, Riley Huntley 02:19, 14 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Not notable other than a couple of mentions in some news sources, which certainly isn't "significant coverage" per WP:GNG. Sorry. TBr and ley 03:24, 14 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete no significant coverage in independent sources. -—Kvng 16:13, 15 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.